ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring the frontier of dental education: a cross-sectional study of VR simulation and manikin-based training at Ziauddin university.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immersive Reality-Based Training Simulator for Dental Extraction: Protocol for a Randomized Pilot Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental education blends theoretical concepts with practical tasks, where preclinical simulations using manikins have long been integral. However, the limitations of manikin-based training, such as cost, material restrictions, and inter-rater reliability concerns, have led to the integration of emerging technologies like Virtual Reality (VR) to enhance learning. VR provides an immersive environment to practice clinical skills, offering potential flexibility, engagement, and tactile learning advantages. This study compares dental students' perceptions of VR and manikin training at Ziauddin University, Karachi. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Ziauddin University College of Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan, involving 229 dental students enrolled in various levels of the BDS program. A structured questionnaire assessed students' experiences and perceptions of VR simulation and manikin training. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22, with descriptive statistics and independent T-tests to evaluate differences in perception across student groups.
resultsBoth VR and manikin training were effective in improving learning. Manikins were preferred for realistic clinical scenarios, while VR was favored for engagement and tactile learning. 68.6% of students found both methods equally useful for reinforcing knowledge, 77.7% felt more confident after manikin training, and 97.4% found VR effective for understanding tooth textures.
conclusionThis study highlights the complementary strengths of VR and manikin-based training in dental education. Both methods should be integrated to provide a more effective and well-rounded learning experience. Further research is needed to explore VR's cost-effectiveness and use in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.