ArticleBMC cancer2025
The impact of EGFR mutation and PD-L1 status on the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in stage III-pN2 NSCLC.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with completely resected stage III-pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. PORT is not routinely recommended for patients with completely resected stage III-pN2 NSCLC. Therefore, identifying the population that could benefit from PORT is urgently needed.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 251 patients with completely resected stage III-pN2 NSCLC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. The Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The cumulative incidence rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) were calculated via competing risk analyses and compared using the Gray test.
resultsA total of 251 patients were enrolled in the study, with the median follow-up of 24.9 months. Among overall patients, 61 patients underwent PORT, and 190 patients did not. Although patients in the PORT group exhibited a trend toward longer DFS, the difference was not statistically significant (median DFS: 39.1 vs. 35.5 months; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.97; p = 0.072). Subgroup analyses revealed that PORT significantly prolonged DFS both in EGFR wild-type patients (median DFS: 35.3 vs. 18.3 months; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.62; p = 0.002) and in PD-L1 positive patients (median DFS: 35.3 vs.16.4 months; HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.74; p = 0.029). In contrast, no significant DFS or OS benefits were observed in EGFR mutant patients or PD-L1 negative patients. Furthermore, PORT was associated with the significantly lower risk of LRR in overall patients (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.97; p = 0.043), EGFR wild-type patients (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.68; p = 0.007), and PD-L1 positive patients (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.70; p = 0.016). PORT did not confer a locoregional control benefit in EGFR mutant patients (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.07-4.58; p = 0.61) or PD-L1 negative patients (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.27-3.82; p = 0.98).
conclusionFor patients with completely resected stage III-pN2 NSCLC, PORT significantly improves DFS and reduces the risk of LRR in EGFR wild-type patients or PD-L1 positive patients. The EGFR and PD-L1 status may serve as biomarkers to identify the population that could benefit from PORT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.