Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355846›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Understanding the barriers and facilitators to delivering peer support effectively in England: a qualitative interview study.

Una Foye, Natasha Lyons, Prisha Shah, Lizzie Mitchell, Karen Machin, Beverley Chipp, Stephen Jeffreys, Tamar Jeynes, Karen Persaud, Vicky Nicholls and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Peer support groups through an experiential lens.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Una FoyeNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Department of Mental Health Nursing Research Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London (KCL), SE5 8AF, UK. una.foye@kcl.ac.uk.
Natasha LyonsNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Prisha ShahNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Lizzie MitchellNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Karen MachinNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Beverley ChippNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Stephen JeffreysNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Tamar JeynesNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Karen PersaudNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Vicky NichollsNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Ruth E CooperNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Department of Mental Health Nursing Research Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London (KCL), SE5 8AF, UK.
Andrew GrundyNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Tamara PemovskaNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Nafiso AhmedNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Rebecca AppletonNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Julie RepperImplementing Recovery through Organisational Change (ImROC), ImROC Head Office, Nottingham, UK.
Sonia JohnsonNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Alan SimpsonNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Department of Mental Health Nursing Research Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London (KCL), SE5 8AF, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer support roles within mental health services are rapidly increasing in number and scope in the UK and internationally. This paper explores the facilitators and barriers to delivering peer support effectively, as experienced by Peer Support Workers (PSWs) in a range of services and settings.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with paid mental health PSWs working across a range of settings in England. We took a collaborative, participatory approach. Interviews were carried out by researchers with experience of living with and/or supporting others with mental health conditions, and for some having experience delivering peer support themselves, and data were analysed using methods guided by general principles of thematic analysis.

resultsWe interviewed 35 PSWs with a range of roles that spanned a range of mental health areas, and regions. Overarching facilitators and barriers were identified including the need for roles to have flexibility with some structure and boundaries; the need for support, supervision and training to ensure PSWs are skilled in delivering the unique elements of their job; the importance of working with a strong team and leaders who support and value PSW; the complexity of working where there are tensions between the flexibility of PSW and the structures of existing healthcare systems, as well as the systemic factors such as funding, pay and progression can have an effect both on the personal experience of PSWs and on the value placed on PSWs in the wider organisation.

conclusionOur findings highlight the complexity of peer support work and PSW roles, with a variety both of facilitators allowing them to carry out roles effectively and the barriers to doing so. As PSWs numbers and the scope of their roles increase, awareness of barriers and facilitators needs to inform PSW job roles, support systems and integration into teams and systems.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesPeer GroupSocial SupportEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchPeer supportPeer workersQualitative

Identifiers

PMID40355846
PMCPMC12070543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.