ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Monoclonal antibody administration in an academic institution and private neurological practice: a tale of two clinics.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Regulatory, clinical, and post-marketing challenges of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: insights from real-world data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety profiles of lecanemab: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Pooled it
- Letter to the editor: Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies for people with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies in Early Alzheimer Disease: Lecanemab and Donanemab.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Anti-Amyloid Antibodies in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Descriptive Analysis of Retrospective Observational Real-World Evidence of a Monoclonal Anti-Amyloid Therapy Program in a Wide Catchment Specialty Memory Clinic.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Safety and short-term outcomes of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease in China: a multicentre study.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease: An update from the Alzheimer's Association ARIA workgroup.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Affective neuropsychiatric symptom metrics in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center dataset.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Real world clinical practice of lecanemab at PUMCH dementia cohort: focus on dynamic imaging and biomarker evolution.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Affective Neuropsychiatric Symptom Metrics in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Dataset.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Lecanemab treatment for Alzheimer's Disease of varying severities and associated plasma biomarkers monitoring: A multi-center real-world study in China.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Real-world determinants of time to initiation of anti-amyloid treatments: comparative data from private and academic practice settings.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of monoclonal antibody (MABs) drugs since the FDA approval of lecanemab has resulted in dramatic changes in the clinical approach and management of early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). Challenges with MAB adoption into clinical practice may vary depending on whether the institution is an academic/integrated healthcare organization versus a private neurological practice. We have combined demographic and clinical data from a high-volume East coast private neurology practice and a West coast academic memory clinic at post-MAB adoption. Combined data of N = 165 patient showed the following demographics: mean age 72, 67% female, 92% Caucasian, average MOCA 18/30 with amyloid status confirmed by CSF in 72% of patients. Overall, ARIA rates were 8% for ARIA-E and 7% for ARIA-H, and there were no mortalities over the observation period. Three patients required immediate medical attention due to ARIA radiographic findings associated with clinical symptoms. The private practice enrolled patients with lower average cognitive screening scores than the academic practice, but was more efficient at initiation therapy (mean # of weeks between diagnosis and treatment 97 versus 149 days). The average patient out-of-pocket cost was ($654.38) significantly less than the 20% of the annual drug cost as previously estimated. The findings from two separate clinical environments support the notion that ARIA risk associated with lecanemab is no greater than what was found in the CLARITY-AD trial and that the costs to the patient were less than predicted. This study was limited by the lack of 12 month efficacy data. Additional real-world data relating to the clinical effectiveness of MAB use in clinical practice will be necessary to best determine the risk/benefit ratio of these drugs in community populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40355750What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.