ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025
Reservoir placement options: a state of the art review.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical considerations in prosthetic urology.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Recognition to repair: Managing reservoir complications in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.BJUI compass · 2026Review
- Comment on: reservoir migration in inflatable penile prostheses: a systematic review and development of a clinical decision algorithm.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reservoir placement for the inflatable penile prosthesis has evolved over time with surgical safety and functional outcomes driving innovative changes. This state of the art review describes contemporary placement options for the inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir, including traditional space of Retzius placement and other alternate reservoir placements. The space of Retzius remains a familiar location for virgin placements while submuscular placement has gained popularity for its versatility and lower risk of visceral injury. The lateral retroperitoneal location can be considered for a patient with a hostile pelvis. A comparison of complications and functional outcomes highlights benefits and drawbacks of each location. This review aims to equip the prosthetic urologist with modern techniques and a surgical armamentarium that can address any reservoir placement.
Identifiers
40355695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.