Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355690›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Effect of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction on Lesion Conspicuity of Liver Metastases in Pre- and Post-contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Yasutaka Ichikawa, Daisuke Hasegawa, Kensuke Domae, Motonori Nagata, Hajime Sakuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasutaka IchikawaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan. yasutaka@med.mie-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-207X
Daisuke HasegawaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Kensuke DomaeDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Motonori NagataDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Hajime SakumaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of deep learning image reconstruction at medium and high intensity levels (DLIR-M and DLIR-H, respectively) for better delineation of liver metastases in pre-contrast and post-contrast CT, compared to conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) methods. Forty-one patients with liver metastases who underwent abdominal CT were studied. The raw data were reconstructed with three different algorithms: hybrid IR (ASiR-V 50%), DLIR-M (TrueFildelity-M), and DLIR-H (TrueFildelity-H). Three experienced radiologists independently rated the lesion conspicuity of liver metastases on a qualitative 5-point scale (score 1 = very poor; score 5 = excellent). The observers also selected each image series for pre- and post-contrast CT per patient that was considered most preferable for liver metastases assessment. For pre-contrast CT, lesion conspicuity scores for DLIR-H and DLIR-M were significantly higher than those for hybrid IR for two of the three observers, while there was no significant difference for one observer. For post-contrast CT, the lesion conspicuity scores for DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those for DLIR-M images for two of the three observers on post-contrast CT (Observer 1: DLIR-H, 4.3 ± 0.8 vs. DLIR-M, 3.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.0006; Observer 3: DLIR-H, 4.6 ± 0.6 vs. DLIR-M, 4.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.0013). For post-contrast CT, all observers most often selected DLIR-H as the best reconstruction method for the diagnosis of liver metastases. However, in the pre-contrast CT, there was variation among the three observers in determining the most preferred image reconstruction method, and DLIR was not necessarily preferred over hybrid IR for the diagnosis of liver metastases.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiver NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaComputed tomographyDeep-learning image reconstructionHybrid iterative reconstructionImage qualityLesion conspicuityLiver metastasis

Identifiers

PMID40355690
PMCPMC12921096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.