ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
Adults interpret iconicity in speech and gesture via the same modality-independent process.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iconicity is the resemblance or similarity between the form of a signal and its meaning. In two studies, we investigated whether adults interpret iconicity in speech and gesture via a modality-independent mechanism (Study 1, N = 40; Study 2, N = 348). Participants in both studies completed two verb-action matching tasks. In these tasks, either spoken verbs or co-speech gestures were manipulated at different rates to iconically represent actions (i.e., manners of locomotion) performed at corresponding rates. We hypothesized that adult participants would map verbs spoken at a fast rate to fast actions and verbs spoken at a slow rate to slow actions. Similarly, we hypothesized that adult participants would map gestures produced with faster hand movements to fast actions and gestures produced with slower hand movements to slow actions. Moreover, we predicted a positive correlation between the two task performances. In both a pilot study (Study 1) and a preregistered replication (Study 2), participants successfully used iconic cues to match verbs to actions in both verb-action matching tasks. Crucially, adult participants who performed well in the verb-action matching task with iconic speech cues also performed well in the verb-action matching task with iconic gesture cues. This weak positive correlation remained significant even after controlling verbal working memory performance. These findings suggest that adults may rely on a modality-independent cognitive mechanism for interpreting iconicity both within and across different sensory modalities, using both visual information from gestures and auditory information from speech to identify referent actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.