Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355531›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2025

Dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease dementia - the same or different and is it important?

YuHong Fu, Glenda M Halliday

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

YuHong FuBrain and Mind Centre & Faculty of Medicine and Health School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4539-2039
Glenda M HallidayBrain and Mind Centre & Faculty of Medicine and Health School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. glenda.halliday@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0422-8398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological definitions of neurological diseases are now becoming a reality, although still in the research phase. This development will recategorize neurological diseases, providing objective diagnostics and the promise of therapeutics that target biological mechanisms - similar to the strategy that has proven successful in tumours and other conditions. In this Perspective article, we discuss this development for dementias with dominant Lewy pathology, as the availability of biological assays for this pathology has sparked new interest in a single disease diagnosis for all individuals positive for α-synuclein. On the basis of current evidence, we argue that an α-synuclein assay alone is unlikely to be a specific criterion for a spectrum of clinical syndromes with Lewy pathology or a definitive diagnostic marker for Lewy body dementia. We advocate that one biological assay will not reflect the complex spatiotemporal features of brain pathology. Diverse sequential mechanisms underpin the highly heterogeneous phenotypes and clinicopathological processes of Lewy body dementias. Disease modification, if possible, will be most effective when it targets the early underlying mechanisms, especially those leading to aggressive phenotypes.

Indexed as

Lewy Body DiseaseParkinson Diseasealpha-SynucleinHumansalpha-Synuclein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.