Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355526›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025

Augmented reality microscopy to bridge trust between AI and pathologists.

Sunil Badve, George L Kumar, Tobias Lang, Eli Peigin, James Pratt, Robert Anders, Deyali Chatterjee, Raul S Gonzalez, Rondell P Graham, Alyssa M Krasinskas and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sunil Badve *Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. sbadve@emory.edu.
George L Kumar *Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA. george.kumar@astrazeneca.com.
Tobias Lang *Mindpeak, Hamburg, Germany. tobias.lang@mindpeak.ai.
Eli PeiginAugmentiqs, D.N, Misgav, Israel.
James PrattBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Robert AndersJohns Hopkins University Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Deyali ChatterjeeMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Raul S GonzalezEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rondell P GrahamMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alyssa M KrasinskasEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Xiuli LiuWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Alexander QuaasCologne University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Romil SaxenaEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Namrata SetiaUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Laura TangMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hanlin L WangUCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Josef RüschoffDiscovery Life Sciences Biomarker Services GmbH, Kassel, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausDiscovery Life Sciences Biomarker Services GmbH, Kassel, Germany.
Khalid DaifallaMindpeak, Hamburg, Germany.
Marc PäpperMindpeak, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick FreyMindpeak, Hamburg, Germany.
Felix FaberMindpeak, Hamburg, Germany.
Maria KarasaridesBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA. maria@delphina.io.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic certainty is the cornerstone of modern medicine and critical for maximal treatment benefit. When evaluating biomarker expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), however, pathologists are hindered by complex scoring methodologies, unique positivity cut-offs and subjective staining interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) can potentially eliminate diagnostic uncertainty, especially when AI "trustworthiness" is proven by expert pathologists in the context of real-world clinical practice. Building on an IHC foundation model, we employed pathologists-in-the-loop finetuning to produce a programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) CPS AI Model. We devised a multi-head augmented reality microscope (ARM) system overlayed with the PD-L1 CPS AI Model to assess interobserver variability and gauge the pathologists' trust in AI model outputs. Using difficult to interpret regions on gastroesophageal biopsies, we show that AI-assistance improved case agreement between any 2 pathologists by 14% (agreement on 77% vs 91%) and among 11 pathologists by 26% (agreement on 43% vs 69%). At a clinical cutoff of PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, the number of cases diagnosed as positive by all 11 pathologists increased by 31%. Our findings underscore the benefits of fully engaging pathologists as active participants in the development and deployment of IHC AI models and frame the roadmap for trustworthy AI as a bridge to increased adoption in routine pathology practice.

Identifiers

PMID40355526
PMCPMC12069518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.