Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355522›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quantitative evaluation and prediction of the relative complexity of Sangshuping coal mine tectonics in the Hancheng mining area.

Rongjun Du, Yucheng Xia, Xueyang Sun, Lintian Miao, Chen Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rongjun DuCollege of Geology and Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China. 31319284@qq.com.
Yucheng XiaCollege of Geology and Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China.
Xueyang SunCollege of Geology and Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China.
Lintian MiaoKey Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi'an, 710021, China.
Chen GuoCollege of Geology and Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, the relative complexity of the tectonics in the Sangshuping coal mine was studied. On the basis of the assumption of equal blocks, using entropy function analysis and stepwise regression analysis, an empirical formula for quantitatively evaluating structural relative complexity was established from the structural characteristics in the exposed area, and then the formula was applied to the prediction of relative tectonic complexity in the unexposed area. The results are as follows. First, the main factors affecting the structural relative complexity of the No. 3 coal seam were the number of contour lines, the thickness of the overlying sandstone, the abnormality index of the coal seam thickness, and the lithology of the coal seam roof. Second, the complexity level in the exposed area of the No. 3 coal seam was mainly medium, and the level in the unexposed area was simple. The tectonics in the southern part of the coal mine were more complex than those in the north, and those in the east were more complex than those in the west. Finally, the relative complexity level of the No. 11 coal seam was simple; the tectonics of the northern part were relatively simple, and those of the central and southern parts were moderate.

Indexed as

Hancheng mining areaIndicator evaluationIsotropic segmentQuantitative evaluationRelative complexity of geological tectonicsSangshuping coal mine

Identifiers

PMID40355522
PMCPMC12069658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.