Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355513›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multiscale gradients of corticopontine structural connectivity.

Paul-Noel Rousseau, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Christopher J Steele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pontine Functional Connectivity Gradients.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul-Noel RousseauDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. paul.rousseau@mail.mcgill.ca.
Pierre-Louis BazinFull brain picture Analytics, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Christopher J SteeleDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé FRQS CB Junior 2 - 349443Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2020-06812the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada HNC 170723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum's involvement in a range of cognitive, emotional, and motor processes has become increasingly evident. Given the uniformity of the cerebellar cortex's cellular architecture its contributions to varied processes are thought be partially mediated by its patterns of reciprocal connectivity with the rest of the brain. A better understanding of these connections is therefore fundamental to disentangling the cerebellum's contribution to cognition and behavior. While these connections have been studied extensively in non-human animals using invasive methods, we have limited knowledge of these connections in humans. The current work reconstructed the corticopontine projection, the first segment of downstream connections between the cerebral and cerebellar cortices, with diffusion MRI tractography in human in-vivo whole brain data and an independent higher resolution postmortem brainstem dataset. Dimensionality reduction was used to characterize the pattern of connectivity of cerebral cortical projections to the pons as two overlapping gradients that were consistent across participants and datasets: medial to lateral and core to belt. Our findings align with invasive work done in animals and advance our understanding of this connection in humans - providing valuable context to a growing body of cerebellar research, offering insights into impacts of damage along the pathway, and informing clinical interventions.

Indexed as

Cerebellar CortexCerebral CortexPonsAdultCerebellumDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysCerebellumCorticopontineGradientsPonsTractography

Identifiers

PMID40355513
PMCPMC12069677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.