Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355506›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automated generation of discharge summaries: leveraging large language models with clinical data.

Matthias Ganzinger, Nicola Kunz, Pascal Fuchs, Cornelia K Lyu, Martin Loos, Martin Dugas, Thomas M Pausch

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07491068 (Safety and Workflow Impact of Large Language Model-Assisted Hospital Course Summaries), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07491068 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Workflow Impact of Large Language Model-Assisted Hospital Course Summaries: Protocol for a Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Non-Inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPavol Jozef Safarik UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled786ConditionsHospitalizationsArmsLLM assisted workflow for generating the hospital course summary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias Ganzinger *Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. matthias.ganzinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Nicola Kunz *Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal FuchsDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Cornelia K LyuDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin LoosDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin DugasInstitute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas M PauschInstitute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the use of open-source large language models (LLMs) to automate generation of German discharge summaries from structured clinical data. The structured data used to produce AI-generated summaries were manually extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) by a trained medical professional. By leveraging structured documentation collected for research and quality management, the goal is to assist physicians with editable draft summaries. After de-identifying 25 patient datasets, we optimized the output of the LLaMA3 model through prompt engineering and evaluated it using error analysis, as well as quantitative and qualitative metrics. The LLM-generated summaries were rated by physicians on comprehensiveness, conciseness, correctness, and fluency. Key results include an error rate of 2.84 mistakes per summary, and low-to-moderate alignment between generated and physician-written summaries (ROUGE-1: 0.25, BERTScore: 0.64). Medical professionals rated the summaries 3.72 ± 0.89 for comprehensiveness and 3.88 ± 0.97 for factual correctness on a 5-point Likert-scale; however, only 60% rated the comprehensiveness as good (4 or 5 out of 5). Despite overall informativeness, essential details-such as patient history, lifestyle factors, and intraoperative findings-were frequently omitted, reflecting gaps in summary completeness. While the LLaMA3 model captured much of the clinical information, complex cases and temporal reasoning presented challenges, leading to factual inaccuracies, such as incorrect age calculations. Limitations include a small dataset size, missing structured data elements, and the model's limited proficiency with German medical terminology, highlighting the need for large, more complete datasets and potential model fine-tuning. In conclusion, this work provides a set of real-world methods, findings, experiences, insights, and descriptive results for a focused use case that may be useful to guide future work in the LLM generation of discharge summaries, perhaps especially for those working with German and possibly other non-English content.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient DischargePatient Discharge SummariesGermanyHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID40355506
PMCPMC12069548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.