ArticleScientific reports2025
Augustus' solar meridian functioning and the birth of the western leap year.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 12 BCE, Augustus undertook the responsibility for the calendar, which had gradually fallen out of alignment with the true dates of solstices and equinoxes. Augustus' calendar reform, entailing the introduction of a leap day every four years, coincided with the erection of a grand meridian in the Campus Martius, known in Latin as Horologium Augusti. This device utilized the obelisk of Psamtik II (6° century BCE) as its gnomon that casted its shadow upon a travertine floor inscribed with bronze reference marks. Despite the discovery of the obelisk in 18th century and partial excavation of the floor in 1980, comprehending its geometric intricacies, regarding both dimensions and positioning, remained a challenge due to the complexities of conducting precise geomatic measurements in subterranean environments. Consequently, uncertainties persisted regarding its operational mechanics, particularly regarding whether the marks denoted days or ecliptic degrees. This study presents accurate measurements and statistically rigorous analyses that enable a precise repositioning of the meridian and a careful reconstruction of its geometry. The results suggest that the marks likely denoted specific days of the year, as recalled by Pliny the Elder. This provides support to the hypothesis that the monument functioned as an empirical validation of Augustus' calendrical reform. In addition, the great accuracy achieved in positioning represents a fundamental aid in the desirable scenario to continue excavations of the meridian.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.