ArticleScientific reports2025
Classification of multi-lead ECG based on multiple scales and hierarchical feature convolutional neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning Periodic Patterns in ECG Signals Using TimesNet for Automated Cardiac Classification.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting and classifying arrhythmias is essential in diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. However, current deep learning-based classification methods often encounter difficulties in effectively integrating both the morphological and temporal features of Electrocardiograms (ECGs). To address this challenge, we propose a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that incorporates mixed scales and hierarchical features combined with the Lead Encoder Attention (LEA) mechanism for multi-lead ECG classification. We validated the performance of our proposed method using the intrapatient approach of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia (MIT-BIH-AR) Database and the interpatient approach of the Chinese Cardiovascular Disease Database (CCDD). Our model achieves an Accuracy (Acc) of 99.5% for the classification of normal and abnormal heartbeats in the MIT-BIH-AR database. Our method achieves a TPR95 (NPV under the condition of True Positive Rate being equal to 95 percent) of 78.5% and an Acc of 88.5% when classifying normal and abnormal ECG records from over 150,000 ECG records in the CCDD. The cross-dataset experimental results also confirm the model's strong generalization capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.