Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355497›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing noninvasive pancreatic cystic neoplasm diagnosis with multimodal machine learning.

Wei Huang, Yue Xu, Zhao Li, Jun Li, Qing Chen, Qiang Huang, Yaping Wu, Hongtan Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07543263 (An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07543263 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography

TypeobservationalSponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled176ConditionsPancreatic Cystic Lesion (PCL)ArmsiEUS-PCL(intelligent endoscopic ultrasound system- pancreatic cystic lesion)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei Huang *Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yue Xu *Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhao LiResearch Center for Data Hub and Security, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, China. lzjoey@gmail.com.
Jun LiDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qing ChenDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qiang HuangDepartment of Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yaping WuDepartment of Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hongtan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. chenhongtan@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are a complex group of lesions with a spectrum of malignancy. Accurate differentiation of PCN types is crucial for patient management, as misdiagnosis can result in unnecessary surgeries or treatment delays, affecting the quality of life. The significance of developing a non-invasive, accurate diagnostic model is underscored by the need to improve patient outcomes and reduce the impact of these conditions. We developed a machine learning model capable of accurately identifying different types of PCNs in a non-invasive manner, by using a dataset comprising 449 MRI and 568 CT scans from adult patients, spanning from 2009 to 2022. The study's results indicate that our multimodal machine learning algorithm, which integrates both clinical and imaging data, significantly outperforms single-source data algorithms. Specifically, it demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in classifying PCN types, achieving an average accuracy of 91.2%, precision of 91.7%, sensitivity of 88.9%, and specificity of 96.5%. Remarkably, for patients with mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), regardless of undergoing MRI or CT imaging, the model achieved a 100% prediction accuracy rate. It indicates that our non-invasive multimodal machine learning model offers strong support for the early screening of MCNs, and represents a significant advancement in PCN diagnosis for improving clinical practice and patient outcomes. We also achieved the best results on an additional pancreatic cancer dataset, which further proves the generality of our model.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPancreatic CystPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedClinical screeningDiagnostic classificationMachine learningMultimodal dataPancreatic cystic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40355497
PMCPMC12069609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.