ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing noninvasive pancreatic cystic neoplasm diagnosis with multimodal machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07543263 (An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- EUS-Anchored Multimodal Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Toward a Conceptual Diagnostic Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Factors Associated with Stage at Diagnosis in Pancreatic Cancer: Implications for Precision Screening and Early Detection.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Uncertainty-Aware Explainable AI for Pancreatic Cysts: Identifying Deep Learning Vulnerabilities and Ensuring Safe Clinical Triage in IPMN Management.Research square · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm imaging: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer prediction: from transparency to clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Pancreatic Cyst Management: A Multimodal and Interdisciplinary Approach.Journal of radiological scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are a complex group of lesions with a spectrum of malignancy. Accurate differentiation of PCN types is crucial for patient management, as misdiagnosis can result in unnecessary surgeries or treatment delays, affecting the quality of life. The significance of developing a non-invasive, accurate diagnostic model is underscored by the need to improve patient outcomes and reduce the impact of these conditions. We developed a machine learning model capable of accurately identifying different types of PCNs in a non-invasive manner, by using a dataset comprising 449 MRI and 568 CT scans from adult patients, spanning from 2009 to 2022. The study's results indicate that our multimodal machine learning algorithm, which integrates both clinical and imaging data, significantly outperforms single-source data algorithms. Specifically, it demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in classifying PCN types, achieving an average accuracy of 91.2%, precision of 91.7%, sensitivity of 88.9%, and specificity of 96.5%. Remarkably, for patients with mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), regardless of undergoing MRI or CT imaging, the model achieved a 100% prediction accuracy rate. It indicates that our non-invasive multimodal machine learning model offers strong support for the early screening of MCNs, and represents a significant advancement in PCN diagnosis for improving clinical practice and patient outcomes. We also achieved the best results on an additional pancreatic cancer dataset, which further proves the generality of our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.