ArticleScientific reports2025
Monitoring subsurface soil displacement in karst collapse by designing a MEMS-based spherical monitoring device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bifurcation-based wide-range vacuum pressure micro-sensor.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address challenges in monitoring subsurface soil displacement in karst collapse areas, a MEMS-based spherical monitoring device was developed to accommodate complex subsurface monitoring environments. Six sets of fixed-distance tests were designed to verify the flexibility of the spherical monitoring devices in moving with the sub-surface soil. Furthermore, four indoor model tests were conducted to acquire displacement data, which were developed from MEMS sensors and MEMS sensors with spherical shell arranged at identical positions. PIV was employed to analyze the monitoring accuracy of the MEMS spherical monitoring device and MEMS sensor in karst collapse model tests, to further evaluate the practicality of the spherical monitoring devices for monitoring in karst collapse. The results of the fixed-distance tests indicate that the spherical monitoring device effectively mitigates the influence of soil pressure on the monitoring cables. Model test results show that, in comparison to MEMS sensor, the MEMS spherical monitoring device exhibits a reduced average relative error of 23.09% in stable zone displacement measurements and 18.87% in the subsidence zone. This suggests that the MEMS-based spherical monitoring device better captures variations in sub-surface soil displacement. This paper provides a new insight for karst collapse monitoring and the application of MEMS sensors in geotechnical engineering.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.