Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355433›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Common brain representations of action and perception investigated with cross-modal classification of newly learned melodies.

Yu-Hsin Fiona Chang, Fredrik Ullén, Örjan de Manzano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu-Hsin Fiona ChangDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, 60322, Frankfurt, Germany. yu-hsin.chang@ae.mpg.de.
Fredrik UllénDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, 60322, Frankfurt, Germany.
Örjan de ManzanoDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, 60322, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important feature of human cognition is the ability to predict sensory outcomes of motor actions and infer actions from sensory information - a process enabled by action-perception coupling. Through repeated and consistent sensory feedback, bidirectional sensorimotor associations can become highly automatic with experience. In musicians, for instance, auditory cortex activity can increase spontaneously even when observing piano playing without auditory feedback. A key question is whether such associations rely on shared neural representations, or a "common code", between actions and their sensory outcomes. To test this, we trained non-musicians to play two melodies with different pitch sequences on the piano. The following day, they underwent an fMRI experiment with an MR-compatible piano while (a) playing the trained melodies without auditory feedback but imagining the sound, and (b) listening to the same melodies without playing but imagining the finger movements. Within-condition multivariate pattern analyses revealed that patterns of activity in auditory-motor regions represent pitch sequences. Importantly, cross-modal classification showed that these patterns generalized across conditions in the right premotor cortex, indicating the emergence of a common code across perception and action.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrainLearningMusicAcoustic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexPitch PerceptionYoung AdultAction-perception couplingfMRIMusic perceptionMVPASequence learning

Identifiers

PMID40355433
PMCPMC12069664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.