Trial reportBlood cancer journal2025
Phase II study of venetoclax added to bendamustine and obinutuzumab in patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma as front-line therapy: PrE0403.
Trial report in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03113422 (Phase II Study of Venetoclax), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study of Venetoclax (ABT-199/GDC-0199) in Combination With Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine in Patients With High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma as Front Line Therapy
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Obinutuzumab versus rituximab-based chemotherapy in high-tumor burden indolent B-cell lymphoma: a real-world comparative study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Novel targeted drugs for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over-expression of BCL-2 defines follicular lymphoma (FL). Venetoclax (VEN), a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, has previously been evaluated with bendamustine-based chemoimmunotherapy. VEN was given continuously, resulting in promising efficacy but unacceptable toxicity. The Phase II PrE0403 study was designed to evaluate intermittent dosing of VEN (10 days per cycle) combined with obinutuzumab and bendamustine (VEN-OB) in untreated FL subjects with high-risk features defined as a FLIPI-1 score of ≥3 and/or high tumor burden by GELF criteria. A total of 56 subjects were planned to be accrued with a goal of having 51 subjects eligible to improve the historical 50% CR rate to 65% with an 85% power and 15% type I error rate. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of 3 antiapoptotic proteins (BCL-xL, MCL-1, and BCL-2) was performed and correlated with clinical outcomes. All 56 subjects were eligible and treated. CR rate was 41/56 (73.2%) and ORR was 52/56 (92.5%) meeting the primary endpoint. 2-year estimated PFS was 87.5% (90% CI: 75.3,93.9%) and 2-year estimated OS was 94.6% (90% CI: 86.7, 97.9%). However, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events ≥ grade 3 was 83.9% and serious adverse events were seen in 57.1%. After induction, atypical infections, including Grade 5 events, occurred. Anti-apoptotic protein expression by IHC was not correlated with clinical outcomes. Thus, while meeting the primary efficacy end point, VEN-OB is considered overly toxic in high-risk FL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.