Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355396›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Computer vision analysis of luteal color Doppler ultrasonography for early and automated pregnancy diagnosis in Bos taurus beef cows.

Lucas Melo Gonçalves, Pedro Levy Piza Fontes, Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucas Melo GonçalvesDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Pedro Levy Piza FontesDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1369-5641
Anderson Antonio Carvalho AlvesDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Funding

Integrative Precision Agriculture 2023-2644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the suitability of applying supervised deep learning (DL) algorithms for early and real-time pregnancy diagnosis in beef cattle using luteal color Doppler (CD) ultrasonography recorded on days 20 (D20) and 22 (D22) after fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). CD ultrasound videos from 390 females were manually evaluated by trained personnel to perform the human-based pregnancy diagnosis (Human). Images were extracted at a rate of 5 frames per second from each video, resulting in 10,533 (D20) and 10,413 (D22) valid frames after applying a frame-filtering pipeline. Three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures-VGG19, Xception, and ResNet50-along with their averaged inference (Combined), were evaluated using restricted 5-fold cross-validation, ensuring that images from the same animal did not appear in both training and validation sets. Final inferences for each animal were determined by averaging the network outputs across all video frames. Pregnancy status was confirmed on day 29 using conventional ultrasonography and treated as ground truth for assessing both Human and DL-based predictions. Accuracy levels were similar across methods, ranging from 0.84 (VGG19) to 0.87 (Human) for D20 and from 0.86 (VGG19) to 0.93 (Human) for D22. Based on Matthew's correlation coefficient, the Combined and Xception architectures demonstrated the best overall agreement with true pregnancy status among DL models. These architectures performed comparably to human diagnosis, with the Combined model achieving similar F1 scores (0.89 vs 0.91), higher specificity (0.72 vs 0.65), and slightly lower sensitivity (0.95 vs 1.00) on D20. Xception showed similar performance to human diagnosis on D22, with comparable accuracy (0.91 vs 0.93), specificity (0.79 vs 0.81), sensitivity (0.99 vs 1.00), and F1 score (0.93 vs 0.94). In conclusion, DL algorithms can effectively predict pregnancy status using CD ultrasonography earlier than industry-standard methods, with performance comparable to that of trained personnel.

Indexed as

Corpus LuteumPregnancy, AnimalPregnancy TestsUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorAnimalsCattleDeep LearningFemalePregnancybeef cattledeep learningfertilityimage analysis

Identifiers

PMID40355396
PMCPMC12207863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.