Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355390›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Evaluating ecosystem caps on fishery yield in the context of climate stress and predation.

Alberto Rovellini, André E Punt, Martin W Dorn, Isaac C Kaplan, Meaghan D Bryan, Grant Adams, Kerim Aydin, Matthew R Baker, Cheryl L Barnes, Bridget E Ferriss and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating ecosystem caps on fishery yield in the context of climate stress and predation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alberto RovelliniSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-4737
André E PuntSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Martin W DornSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Isaac C KaplanNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Meaghan D BryanAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Grant AdamsSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kerim AydinAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Matthew R BakerSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cheryl L BarnesCoastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon, USA.
Bridget E FerrissAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elizabeth A FultonCSIRO Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Melissa A HaltuchAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Albert J HermannCooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean and Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kirstin K HolsmanAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Carey R McGilliardAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elizabeth A McHuronAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Hem Nalini Morzaria-LunaLong Live The Kings, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Szymon SurmaInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

Climate and Fisheries Adaptation Program 140Y8R1FST/24P01Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies (CICOES) NA15OAR4320063eScience InstituteNorth Pacific Research Board 2006-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem-based fisheries management strives to account for species interactions and ecosystem processes in natural resource management and conservation. In this context, ecosystem-wide caps on total fishery catches have been proposed as one tool to manage multispecies fisheries with an ecosystem approach. However, determining effective ecosystem caps is complicated because fish stock production is influenced by environmental conditions, species interactions, and fishing. Consequently, the implementation of ecosystem caps in fisheries management frameworks remains uncommon. We investigated whether ecosystem caps should account for climate variability and for predator-prey dynamics to achieve management objectives in complex marine ecosystems. We considered the example of the Gulf of Alaska (United States), a North Pacific large marine ecosystem where annual groundfish catches are managed using an "optimum yield" ecosystem cap of 800,000 t. We simulated multispecies yield of the 12 most abundant and commercially valuable groundfish stocks under selected climate and fishing scenarios using an end-to-end marine ecosystem model (Atlantis), which accounts for predator-prey and ecosystem dynamics. We found that total groundfish yield was never projected to exceed the 800,000 mt optimum yield cap across scenarios and fishing mortalities. Projected climate change led to decreased groundfish yield, and predation from the underexploited groundfish predator arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias) led to foregone catches. Groundfish removals had negative indirect effects on groundfish predators, despite total yield never exceeding the optimum yield cap, highlighting that an ineffective cap may not protect non-target species. These results suggest that the optimum yield cap currently used in the Gulf of Alaska may be too high to constrain groundfish catches under future climate change and low exploitation rates of predators. We propose that ecosystem caps should be reviewed when environmental conditions, stock productivity, or species interactions change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFisheriesFishesPredatory BehaviorAlaskaAnimalsModels, BiologicalAtlantisclimate‐integrated modelingecosystem‐based managementecosystem modelingoptimum yieldpredator–prey dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40355390
PMCPMC12069166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.