Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355384›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists2026

Rodent monocyte-derived macrophages do not express CD163: Comparative analysis using macrophages from living boreoeutherians.

Yoichi Saito, Yukio Fujiwara, Yasuka L Yamaguchi, Satomi S Tanaka, Kyoko Miura, Yoshiyuki Hizukuri, Kyoko Yamashiro, Yasuhiro Hayashi, Yuta Nakashima, Yoshihiro Komohara

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yoichi SaitoLaboratory of Bioengineering, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9097-7656
Yukio FujiwaraDepartment of Cell Pathology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2074-0597
Yasuka L YamaguchiLaboratory of Molecular Embryology, Faculty of Health Science, Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Satomi S TanakaLaboratory of Molecular Embryology, Faculty of Health Science, Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kyoko MiuraDepartment of Aging and Longevity Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-149X
Yoshiyuki HizukuriAsubio Pharma Co., Ltd., Kobe, Japan.
Kyoko YamashiroAsubio Pharma Co., Ltd., Kobe, Japan.
Yasuhiro HayashiAsubio Pharma Co., Ltd., Kobe, Japan.
Yuta NakashimaLaboratory of Bioengineering, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-4963
Yoshihiro KomoharaDepartment of Cell Pathology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9723-0846

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H07079Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18J01441Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K07459Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K04845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCD163 is a scavenger receptor predominantly expressed on the surfaces of macrophages in various mammalian species and is a marker of anti-inflammatory (M2-like) macrophages. High density of CD163-positive tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) is associated with worse prognosis in various patient tumors. Interestingly, studies on mice have shown that CD163-positive TAMs only infiltrate the margins of tumor tissues, not the center. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that circulating monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs), which are the origin of most TAMs, do not express CD163 in mice.

resultsWe examined CD163 expression in MDMs, differentiated from healthy animals in vitro, and in normal, pathogenic, and tumorigenic macrophages infiltrating various tumors and organs across multiple species including primates, rodents, cetartiodactylans, and carnivores. We found that MDMs, including TAMs, do not express CD163 in mice. Our findings also suggest that murine CD163-positive macrophages likely originate from a specific subset of resident macrophages, namely fetal liver monocytes/macrophages, as indicated by fetal analysis. Furthermore, we revealed that the CD163-negative expression pattern in MDMs is a trait shared by the rodent clade.

conclusionsRodent MDMs do not express CD163, a phenotype not shared with MDMs of other mammals. Our findings caution against the extrapolation of rodent experimental results to other animal models.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticMacrophagesMonocytesReceptors, Cell SurfaceAnimalsCD163 AntigenHumansMiceAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD163 AntigenReceptors, Cell Surfacefetal liverKupffer cellresident macrophagetumor‐associated macrophageyolk sac

Identifiers

PMID40355384
PMCPMC13087552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.