ReviewZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2025
[Advancements in CRISPR-Cas9 for Fanconi anemia].
Review in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a hereditary bone marrow failure syndrome that is characterized by genomic instability and heightened sensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents. In recent years, the CRISPR-Cas9 technology has exhibited groundbreaking progress in the field of gene therapy for FA. The traditional CRISPR-Cas9 technology has been successfully applied in FA gene editing. Further, single-base editing technology, based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system, performs precise and efficient gene repair for prevalent gene mutations in patients with FA. The prime editing technology provides new possibilities for gene editing; however, its application in FA has not been initiated. Despite significant advancements in FA gene editing technology, several challenges remain, including the collection of sufficient hematopoietic stem cells, the risk of increased tumorigenesis postgene editing, chromosomal instability, and off-target effects. Future research is recommended to focus on optimizing sgRNA and Cas9 nucleases, designing stricter PAM sequences to reduce off-target effects, and devising personalized gene editing strategies. Further, ethical and regulatory issues as well as long-term follow-ups are crucial priorities for future gene editing work. With continuous technological advancements and in-depth clinical trials, we expect more breakthroughs in FA treatment using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology in the future. This article reviews the latest research progress of CRISPR technology in FA treatment and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of this technology in FA gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.