ArticleZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2025
[The Chinese clinical expert consensus for the BCMA bispecific T cell engager in the treatment of multiple myeloma (2025)].
Article in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Chinese expert consensus on infection management in multiple myeloma patients treated with bispecific antibody (2026)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is an incurable disease. The bispecific T cell engager, one of the immune therapies targeting tumor cell surface antigens, has shown promising clinical efficacy. However, bispecific T cell engager therapy has a unique anti-myeloma mechanism and adverse effects. To further standardize the clinical application of B cell maturation antigen bispecific T cell engager, the Chinese Myeloma Committee of the Chinese Hematology Association, the Plasma Cell Disease Group, Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Medical Association and the Society of Hematology of Chinese Geriatrics Association organized experts to formulate the expert consensus by referring to recent domestic and international guidelines, consensus, research progress, and clinical practice, to guide clinical applications better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.