ArticleHealth services research2025
Does Family-Centered Care Coordination Improve Outcomes for Children Enrolled in Early Intervention Services? An Analysis of Colorado's GO4IT Initiative.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining implementation determinants and strategies to scale an electronic assessment option for coordinating family-centred care in early intervention.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Does Family-Centered Care Coordination Improve Outcomes for Children Enrolled in Early Intervention Services? An Analysis of Colorado's GO4IT Initiative.Health services research · 2025Article
- Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure and Decision Support Tool Option for Early Intervention Service Quality: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Trial.Advances in rehabilitation science and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo measure the effect of the adoption of a family-centered care coordination approach in Colorado's early intervention program on family engagement and goal attainment outcomes. STUDY SETTING AND
designWe estimated difference-in-difference models to estimate the effect of Colorado's approach to family-centered care coordination, using Massachusetts as a control group. Massachusetts was chosen because there were no major changes to family-centered care coordination during our sample period. The primary outcome measures one of four exit reasons: disengagement (measured as lost to follow-up or withdrawal), achievement of care plan goals before Age 3, no longer eligible due to Age 3, or moved. Multinomial probit models estimated the effect of Colorado's program on the probability of each exit reason. Additional analyses were stratified by child race and ethnicity groups. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We obtained administrative early intervention data from Massachusetts and Colorado for children who were referred to early intervention in fiscal years 2013-2019 and had a documented exit reason. The full sample includes 103,635 children (n = 20,045 in Colorado; n = 83,590 in Massachusetts). PRINCIPAL
findingsParticipation in Colorado's program was associated with a 4.6 percentage point reduction in family disengagement (p < 0.01) and a 3.5-4.6 percentage point higher likelihood of meeting early intervention care plan goals before Age 3 (p < 0.01). Estimates by race and ethnicity revealed improved engagement of White, Black, and Hispanic families, though only White and Hispanic children were more likely to achieve care plan goals before Age 3.
conclusionsColorado's family-centered care coordination intervention improved family engagement with early intervention services, with fewer families lost to follow-up or withdrawn following early intervention care plan development. These findings can inform evidence-based recommendations to other states considering family-centered care coordination solutions to optimize early intervention service delivery and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.