Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355347›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2025

Does Family-Centered Care Coordination Improve Outcomes for Children Enrolled in Early Intervention Services? An Analysis of Colorado's GO4IT Initiative.

Richard C Lindrooth, Natalie J Murphy, Rick Devoss, Elizabeth Boggs, Mary A Khetani, Gregory J Tung, Juliane Daniel, Beth McManus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard C LindroothUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-9749
Natalie J MurphyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, ACCORDS, Anschutz Health Sciences Building, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Rick DevossUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Elizabeth BoggsUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, ACCORDS, Anschutz Health Sciences Building, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Mary A KhetaniUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Applied Health Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gregory J TungUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Juliane DanielUniversity of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Beth McManusUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS027583AHRQ HHS R01HS027583-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure the effect of the adoption of a family-centered care coordination approach in Colorado's early intervention program on family engagement and goal attainment outcomes. STUDY SETTING AND

designWe estimated difference-in-difference models to estimate the effect of Colorado's approach to family-centered care coordination, using Massachusetts as a control group. Massachusetts was chosen because there were no major changes to family-centered care coordination during our sample period. The primary outcome measures one of four exit reasons: disengagement (measured as lost to follow-up or withdrawal), achievement of care plan goals before Age 3, no longer eligible due to Age 3, or moved. Multinomial probit models estimated the effect of Colorado's program on the probability of each exit reason. Additional analyses were stratified by child race and ethnicity groups. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We obtained administrative early intervention data from Massachusetts and Colorado for children who were referred to early intervention in fiscal years 2013-2019 and had a documented exit reason. The full sample includes 103,635 children (n = 20,045 in Colorado; n = 83,590 in Massachusetts). PRINCIPAL

findingsParticipation in Colorado's program was associated with a 4.6 percentage point reduction in family disengagement (p < 0.01) and a 3.5-4.6 percentage point higher likelihood of meeting early intervention care plan goals before Age 3 (p < 0.01). Estimates by race and ethnicity revealed improved engagement of White, Black, and Hispanic families, though only White and Hispanic children were more likely to achieve care plan goals before Age 3.

conclusionsColorado's family-centered care coordination intervention improved family engagement with early intervention services, with fewer families lost to follow-up or withdrawn following early intervention care plan development. These findings can inform evidence-based recommendations to other states considering family-centered care coordination solutions to optimize early intervention service delivery and equity.

Indexed as

Early Intervention, EducationalPatient-Centered CareChild, PreschoolColoradoFemaleHumansInfantMaleMassachusettschildren with special health care needsearly interventionfamily‐centered care coordination

Identifiers

PMID40355347
PMCPMC12461099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.