ArticleLupus science & medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of belimumab versus rituximab for refractory immune thrombocytopenia in patients with connective tissue disease.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesImmune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a haematological manifestation secondary to connective tissue disease (CTD). Many patients with CTD-ITP are refractory to glucocorticoids (GCs) plus immunosuppressant agents (ISAs); rituximab (RTX) is the recommended second-line therapy. Belimumab (BLM) shows efficacy against CTD. We compared the efficacy and safety of RTX and BLM.
methodsData of patients with CTD-ITP refractory to GCs plus ISAs administered were collected. The data of 11 patients with refractory CTD-ITP who received BLM were compared with those of 15 patients treated with RTX.
resultsAt week 2, BLM resulted in a better overall response (OR) than RTX (72.7% vs 26.7%, p=0.045). The OR rate was 60.0% (9/15), 66.7% (10/15) and 73.3% (11/15) at week 4, 8 and 12, respectively, in the RTX group. It remained at 72.7% (8/11) during week 4-12 in the BLM group. Excluding the data of three deceased patients, the OR rate dropped at week 24 in both groups (RTX vs BLM, 61.5% (8/13) vs 70.0% (7/10), p=1.000). At week 24, four patients with OR in both groups successfully withdrew GCs to <15 mg prednisone (RTX vs BLM, 40% (4/10) vs 66.7% (4/6), p=0.608). The serum C3 level did not significantly change, whereas the serum immunoglobulin G level significantly decreased at week 4, 8 and 12 in both groups. There were three patients with serious adverse effects who died of severe pneumonia during weeks 12-24.
conclusionsBLM may be a safe and effective alternative to RTX for CTD-ITP refractory to GCs plus ISAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.