Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355294›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Association between caregiving factors and depression symptoms in family caregivers of persons with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong: a structural equation analysis.

Honglin Cai, Meiqi Xin, Hector Tsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Honglin CaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7831-6764
Meiqi XinDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Hector TsangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China Hector.Tsang@polyu.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCaregiving has been widely recognised as a potential risk factor for caregivers' psychological well-being in previous studies. The objective of this study is to examine the association between multiple factors of the caregiving process and the depression risk of caregivers, as well as the mediating effect of caregiver burden in these associations.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

participants597 family caregivers of persons with disabilities in December 2020 under the Hong Kong governmental initiative, 'Persons with Disabilities and Rehabilitation Program'. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Indications of depression were assessed through the application of the World Health Organization-Five Well-being Index (1998 version).

resultsA structural equation model (SEM) was applied using Analysis of Moment Structure (AMOS) 28.0 to identify the association between a series of caregiving-related factors and depression risk, as well as test the mediating role of caregiver burden in these associations. 50% of care recipients needed assistance in all four care need categories, with daily living care being the most prominent (72.4%). Caregivers dedicated around 79.6 hours (SD: 52.2) per week on caregiving duties. Nearly 44% of the caregivers had at least one diagnosed disease. Only 5% of caregivers considered that they had a poor caregiving ability, whereas 87.2% of them reported heightened caregiving pressure during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, the average caregiver burden score was 6.6 (SD: 3.3), and the average depression score was 6.7 (SD: 5.1). The results of the SEM model showed that care needs of care recipients (ß (95% CI): -0.201 (-0.355, -0.083), p=0.001), weekly caregiving hours (ß (95% CI): -0.126 (-0.215, -0.067), p=0.001) and presence of emotional issues (ß (95% CI): -0.329 (-0.538, -0.184), p=0.001) were positively associated with depression risk of caregivers, fully mediated by caregiver burden. Additionally, caregivers' health status had both direct (ß (95% CI): -0.234 (-0.388, -0.101), p=0.001) and indirect (ß (95% CI): -0.126 (-0.215, -0.067), p=0.001) effects on depression, indicating that caregiver burden partially mediated this pathway (proportion mediation is 35%). A higher self-evaluation of caregiving ability was related to a lower risk of depression (ß (95% CI): 0.281 (0.169, 0.396), p=0.001), and caregiver burden did not mediate this pathway.

conclusionsCare needs of care recipients, weekly caregiving hours, caregivers' health status and presence of emotional issues during the COVID-19 pandemic were adversely associated with an increased depression risk for caregivers, and these were either fully or partially mediated by caregiver burden. Additionally, caregivers' lower self-evaluation of their caregiving ability was an independent factor that directly contributes to an increased depression risk.

Indexed as

Caregiver BurdenCaregiversCOVID-19DepressionPersons with DisabilitiesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHong KongHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRisk FactorsCaregiver BurdenCOVID-19PSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID40355294
PMCPMC12083302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.