ArticleGenome research2025
STCC enhances spatial domain detection through consensus clustering of spatial transcriptomics data.
Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond benchmarking: an expert-guided consensus approach to spatially aware clustering.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Multi-omics technologies: Novel tools and methods for assessing nerve injury and regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Beyond benchmarking: an expert-guided consensus approach to spatially aware clustering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advance of spatially resolved transcriptomics technologies has yielded substantial spatial transcriptomics data. Deriving biological insights from these data poses nontrivial computational and analysis challenges, of which the most fundamental step is spatial domain detection (or spatial clustering). Although a number of tools for spatial domain detection have been proposed in recent years, their performance varies across data sets and experimental platforms. It is thus an important task to take full advantage of different tools to get a more accurate and stable result through consensus strategy. In this work, we developed STCC, a novel consensus clustering framework for spatial transcriptomics data that aggregates outcomes from state-of-the-art tools using a variety of consensus strategies, including Onehot-based, average-based, hypergraph-based, and wNMF-based methods. Comprehensive assessments on simulated and real data from distinct experimental platforms show that consensus clustering significantly improves clustering accuracy over individual methods under varied input parameters. For normal tissue samples exhibiting clear layered structure, consensus clustering by integrating multiple baseline methods leads to improved results. Conversely, when analyzing tumor samples that display scattered cell type distribution patterns, integration of a single baseline method yields satisfactory performance. For consensus strategies, average-based and hypergraph-based approaches demonstrate optimal precision and stability. Overall, STCC provides a scalable and practical solution for spatial domain detection in spatial transcriptomics data, laying a solid foundation for future research and applications in spatial transcriptomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.