Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355261›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2025

Sustaining the General Practice Nursing Workforce in Australia: Demographics, Job Satisfaction, and Professional Development Challenges.

Wenpeng You, Claire Verrall, Eileen Willis, Danny Hills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenpeng YouSchool of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-1064
Claire VerrallAdelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Eileen WillisCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7576-971X
Danny HillsMonash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General practice nurses (GPNs) are essential members of multidisciplinary primary care teams. Understanding their demographics, career trajectories, and professional challenges is crucial for workforce sustainability. This study examines the demographic characteristics, professional experiences, and career intentions of GPNs in Australia, focusing on workforce sustainability, job satisfaction, and professional development. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among GPNs across Australia. Descriptive analysis, factor analysis, and logistic regression examined demographic trends and professional outcomes. The workforce is aging, with many nearing retirement and an underrepresentation of younger and culturally diverse nurses, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Job satisfaction was moderate, influenced by work-life balance, remuneration, and professional development. Barriers to continuing education included financial constraints and limited institutional support. Logistic regression identified employment status, pay, and professional development as key predictors of job satisfaction and retention. Sustaining the GPN workforce requires strategies to retain experienced nurses, attract younger and diverse entrants, and enhance professional development. Stable funding, an expanded scope of practice, and stronger continuing education support are essential for meeting Australia's evolving primary care needs.

Indexed as

DemographyJob SatisfactionStaff DevelopmentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforcegeneral practice nursesjob satisfactionprimary heal careprofessional developmentworkforce sustainability

Identifiers

PMID40355261
PMCPMC12069001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.