Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355250›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Personal GP continuity improves healthcare outcomes in primary care populations: a systematic review.

Sven Göran Engström, Malin André, Eva Arvidsson, Carl Johan Östgren, Margareta Troein, Lars Borgquist

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [A primary care system in Germany: evidence, opportunities, and implementation].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  2. Maintaining continuity in fragmented healthcare systems.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Residency taught me medicine: practice taught me everything else.Family medicine and community health · 2026
    Article
  6. Access to general practice: why policy must be rural-proofed.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  7. Teamwork and relational infrastructure: a qualitative study of modern UK general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cancer screening.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sven Göran EngströmFuturum Academy of Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Sweden sven.g.engstrom@telia.com.ORCID 0009-0000-4636-625X
Malin AndréDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0941-0378
Eva ArvidssonFuturum Academy of Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2843-2169
Carl Johan ÖstgrenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-3179
Margareta TroeinDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6803-7545
Lars BorgquistDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4635-8935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal continuity is a hallmark for GPs but there is insufficient evidence to support its benefits in ordinary primary care populations.

aimTo investigate the effects of GP personal continuity on the healthcare outcomes of primary care populations. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic review of quantitative studies investigating associations between personal continuity of care and outcomes such as mortality and healthcare utilisation.

methodEmbase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2023. Owing to study heterogeneity the synthesis was conducted narratively; study results were summarised and expressed as having higher (compared with lower) continuity of care. Certainty of each summarised result was assessed using the GRADE framework.

resultsOut of 5792 unique references, 18 studies were included in the final analyses. The outcomes were grouped into three categories of summarised outcomes. Higher (when compared with lower) personal continuity with a GP/family physician probably prevents premature mortality (moderate certainty: four studies, 5 638 305 participants), probably reduces the risk of admission to hospital (moderate certainty: 11 studies, 13 642 684 participants), and probably lowers risk of emergency department visits (moderate certainty: seven studies, 3 855 487 participants).

conclusionHigher, compared with lower, continuity in the relationship between GP and patients in primary care populations is associated with reduced mortality, admissions to hospital, and emergency department visits. Relatively small improvements in personal continuity, which may be achieved in most practices, significantly reduce healthcare consumption, and thus may have an impact on access to care, which has implications for healthcare policy.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareGeneral PractitionersPrimary Health CareHospitalizationHumansPatient Acceptance of Health Carecontinuity of patient carehealth careoutcome assessmentprimary health caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40355250
PMCPMC12729051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.