Observational studyMedicine2025
Care of patients with bacteremia in the setting of a telemedicine-controlled hospital-at-home service is effective and safe: A case-series of 28 patients.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid scale-up of hospital-at-home services during wartime: lessons learned from the Sheba Medical Center experience.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Pyelonephritis Treated in Mayo Clinic's Hospital-at-Home Program.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Deinstitutionalization second time around - What can we learn from the psychiatric experience?Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital-at-home (HAH) is increasingly recognized as a viable alternative to in-hospital stay across various clinical settings. However, until recently, complex patients, particularly those with bacteremia, were not considered suitable candidates for HAH care. The purpose of this article is to describe a unique series of these high-risk patients and the means for attending them at home, for the first time in scientific literature. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a group of patients with bacteremia who were treated in the setting of a telemedicine-controlled HAH service. Twenty-eight patients with blood stream infections were treated in our HAH service. 60.7% were female, with a patient median age of 77 years. Most patients (64.3%) were admitted from the internal medicine ward; 17.86% (5 patients) were admitted at home, and 17.86% were admitted directly from the emergency department. A significant portion had severe comorbidities: 53.6% presented with malignancies, 21.4% presented with dementia, 42.9% presented with diabetes mellitus, 42.9% had chronic kidney disease, and 7 patients (25%) were on continuous immunosuppressive medication. The mean length of HAH stay was 4.1 ± 2.0 days. The majority (67.9%) were discharged at home, while 28.6% required transfer to in-hospital care. One patient died during the HAH stay, and another died during the 30-day follow-up. Telemedicine-controlled HAH service is a viable alternative to traditional in-hospital care for high-risk patients suffering from bacteremia. This is the first clinical report asserting that careful patient selection and meticulous management during HAH care result in good clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.