Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355165›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Patient experience of postoperative pain: a paradigm shift to a holistic approach.

Dan Benhamou, Patrice Forget

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan BenhamouService d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Médecine Péri Opératoire, AP-HP Université Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Bicêtre, France. Electronic address: dan.benhamou@aphp.fr.
Patrice ForgetAberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen, UK; Anaesthesia Department, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK; IMAGINE UR UM 103, Montpellier University, Anesthesia Critical Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine Division, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France; Pain and Opioids After Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ID ESAIC_RG_PAND) Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pain has many unwanted consequences as it delays immediate recovery and may be a factor leading to chronification of pain. Although many studies have shown a link between acute postoperative pain and persistent pain, many other factors may play a role. Maurice-Szamburski and colleagues have shown that acute postoperative pain is not directly associated with the occurrence of chronic pain, but that the pain component of the Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie Générale (EVAN-G) questionnaire is associated with this outcome. As EVAN-G is a questionnaire that focuses on the patient experience after surgery, this is in line with the suggestion that unidimensional pain scores are not sufficient to assess the quality of recovery, and that both clinical studies and practice should move towards a more holistic approach after surgery.

Indexed as

Holistic HealthPostoperative PainChronic PainHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementSurveys and Questionnairesanalgesic drugschronic postsurgical paincomfortpain scorepatient experiencepatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40355165
PMCPMC12106865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.