Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40355106›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2025

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation in Children and Adolescents.

Pieter J Colin, Lynn H Bichajian, Valentin R Curt, Jeroen V Koomen, Thomas Stöhr, Michel M R F Struys, Keira P Mason

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Age-Stratified EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pieter J ColinDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3616-5539
Lynn H BichajianEagle Pharmaceuticals Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey.
Valentin R CurtEagle Pharmaceuticals Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey.
Jeroen V KoomenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Thomas StöhrPaion Pharma GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Michel M R F StruysDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Keira P MasonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemimazolam is not approved for use in pediatric patients. The pharmacokinetics of remimazolam have been reported to be similar to those of adult patients after scaling for body size. This article reports on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pediatric patients aged 6 to 18 yr and a subsequent model-based optimization of the used dosing regimen.

methodsThirty-one patients were included in the trial and stratified across four treatment arms: bolus administration, infusion, bolus plus fentanyl, or infusion plus fentanyl. The University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan) Sedation Scale (UMSS) was used to assess the depth of sedation. Blood samples were drawn to measure the concentrations of remimazolam and its metabolite CNS7054. Population pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling was performed in NONMEM (GloboMax LLC, USA).

resultsA population pharmacokinetic model was developed for remimazolam and CNS7054. The elimination clearance of remimazolam was 0.70 l · min -1 · 70 kg -1 . A proportional odds model combined with a simplified Minto model described the observed UMSS well. The EC50 of remimazolam for a UMSS score of 3 or greater was 777 ng · ml -1 in the absence of fentanyl, and decreased to 655, 533, and 287 ng/ml for concomitant fentanyl steady state concentrations of 1, 2, or 4 ng · ml -1 , respectively. Simulations confirmed that the studied dosing regimen resulted in 9.2 to 22.0% of patients not reaching a UMSS score of 3 or greater at the end of the induction. Model-based optimization resulted in higher per-kilogram dosages and the removal of the maximum allowable dose. Simulations indicated that the percentage of patients achieving a UMSS score of 3 or greater can be expected to be high (88 to 97%).

conclusionsThis study has shown that the pharmacokinetics of remimazolam are likely different between children 6 yr or older and adults (after correcting for size). In addition, the exposure-response relationship shows that to effectively use remimazolam for procedural sedation in children 6 yr or older, the dosing regimen should be modified to allow for higher remimazolam exposures.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesProcedural SedationAdolescentChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFentanylHumansMaleBenzodiazepinesFentanylHypnotics and Sedativesremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID40355106
PMCPMC12227205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.