ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2025
Windows of change: Revisiting temporal and molecular dynamics of memory reconsolidation and persistence.
Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurotransmitters in memory destabilization: An integrative perspective framed by prediction error and novelty.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Transcription factors implicated in substance use disorder, from immediate early genes to altered gene expression.Brain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retrieval can bring memories to a labile state, creating a window to modify its content during reconsolidation. Numerous studies have investigated this period to elucidate reconsolidation mechanisms, understand long-term memory persistence, and develop therapeutic strategies for memory-related psychiatric disorders. However, the temporal dynamics of post-retrieval memory processes have been largely overlooked, leading to mixed findings and hindering the development of targeted interventions. This review discusses retrieval-related cellular and molecular events and how they develop in series and parallel across time. Emerging evidence suggests that some mechanisms triggered after fear memory retrieval can influence either reconsolidation or persistence in different time windows. The temporal boundaries of these post-retrieval processes are still unclear. Further research integrating behavioral and molecular approaches to a deeper understanding of reconsolidation and persistence temporal dynamics is essential to address current debates, including which system/pathway offers the most effective therapeutic window of opportunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.