Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354634›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2025

Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Dannielle Post, Kathleen Whitson, Gaynor Parfitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dannielle PostAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Frome Road, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia, 61 8 830 21212.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8246-0363
Kathleen WhitsonAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Frome Road, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia, 61 8 830 21212.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0332-0037
Gaynor ParfittAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition, and Activity, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Frome Road, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia, 61 8 830 21212.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5547-5797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Australia's aging population is looking to age in place, accessing care alternatives external to the traditional model of residential aged care facilities. This evaluation is situated in a Social Day Program, delivered by an aged care organization. It is designed to cater for people living with dementia, located in an environment equipped with new technologies including age-specific interactive computer gaming, social robots, sensory stimulation, and virtual reality. The technologies are designed to support older adults, enabling them to stay connected and maintain physical and cognitive functioning, independence, and quality of life. Objective: This project aimed to undertake a multifaceted evaluation of the implementation of the new technologies, including an exploration of the barriers and enablers to uptake. The key issue is how to enhance the potential for optimizing the use of these technologies in the Social Day Program environment, to help inform decision-making regarding the implementation of these technologies at the organization's other sites, and future investment in such technologies by aged care organizations generally. Methods: Observation of technology use within the organization was conducted over a 16-week period. Surveys and semistructured interviews were used to collect information from staff related to their experiences with the technology. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Data were triangulated across the sample. Results: Forty-eight observation periods were completed, totaling 126.5 observation hours. Technology use by clients was observed on 24 occasions, for 22 (17.4% of the observation time) hours. Nineteen staff completed surveys. Nearly three-quarters (n=14) of the staff perceived there to be barriers to the clients' use of technology, and 18 (95%) staff reported that they assisted clients to use the technology. Ten (53%) staff reported receiving training to use the technology and feeling confident in their knowledge of the technology to assist clients in using it. Twelve staff members participated in an interview. Key themes identified from the interview data were: technology has potential but is not for everyone, incorporating the subtheme technology as a placation tool, staff knowledge and confidence, and technology functionality and support. Conclusions: This evaluation identified that technology was not being used for the purposes of enrichment or experience enhancement, nor extensively. Multiple barriers to the implementation and sustained use of the technology items were identified. Recommendations to improve implementation and promote sustained use of technology, based on the findings of this evaluation and evidence from the literature, may apply to other organizations seeking to implement these technologies in similar programs.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairesaged careday programevaluationgeriatricinteractive robotsolder adultsperceptionrobotsocial engagement

Identifiers

PMID40354634
PMCPMC12088610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.