ArticleJCO oncology practice2026
Rural Oncologists' Perceptions of Specialty Scarcity and Repercussions for Care Delivery: A Qualitative Study.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changes in patient-sharing patterns after oncologist departures in rural and urban settings: a Medicare cohort study.Applied network science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo understand oncology physician perceptions of and experiences with specialist scarcity in their referral networks, strategies for delivering care after the departure of a colleague who they view as critical to their cancer care networks (ie, a linchpin colleague), and impacts of shortages on patient care.
methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with oncologists who practice in health systems that serve a predominantly rural patient catchment area. We used deductive and inductive approaches to predetermine codes and then performed a thematic analysis.
resultsWe interviewed 20 oncology physicians from five sites. We identified three major themes related to specialist scarcity. The first theme described the effects of physician shortages on care team expertise, collaborative relationships, and patient volume. The second theme uncovered strategies oncologists use when facing physician shortages, including referrals to outside health systems or generalists, practicing outside their subspecialization, and reallocating time from other responsibilities. The third theme identified unintended consequences of adaptive strategies, including greater patient travel burden, less optimal or delayed treatment, reduced access to clinical trials, and increased physician burnout and lower job satisfaction.
conclusionOncology physician shortages lead to myriad adaptive strategies and downstream consequences to patient and physicians. Mapping these cascades can help guide resources to mitigate the negative effects of departures and shortages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.