Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354518›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2025

Proximal femoral replacement with locking plate for massive bone loss: a case report.

Hironori Ochi, Tomonori Baba, Masahiko Nozawa, Suguru Kato, Kyoko Sasaki, Yuko Sakamoto, Sung-Gon Kim, Muneaki Ishijima

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hironori OchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, 3-1-10, Takanodai, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 177-8521, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4112-1015
Tomonori BabaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Masahiko NozawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, 3-1-10, Takanodai, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 177-8521, Japan.
Suguru KatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Kyoko SasakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, 3-1-10, Takanodai, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 177-8521, Japan.
Yuko SakamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, 3-1-10, Takanodai, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 177-8521, Japan.
Sung-Gon KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, 3-1-10, Takanodai, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 177-8521, Japan.
Muneaki IshijimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complications on the femoral side after performing proximal femoral replacement (PFR), such as stem loosening and periprosthetic fractures, are the major reasons for reoperation. Femoral reconstruction was performed using PFR with a locking plate to minimize the risk of complications. We present the case of an 85-year-old woman with stem loosening and massive proximal femoral bone loss (Paprosky type IV) 10 years after stem revision in bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Femoral reconstruction was performed using the following surgical techniques. After removing the previous implant, a PFR was inserted into the host bone of the distal femur and fixed at the junction with cement. In addition, a locking plate was used for bridging. Full weight-bearing rehabilitation was started the day after surgery. At the 5-year follow-up, the patient could walk steadily without complications. A postoperative radiograph of the femur showed no signs of a radiolucent line, implant-related issues, or bone resorption. This reconstructive technique may reduce the high torsional and compressive stresses on bone cement prostheses, which can cause complications on the femoral side. Even in the case of poor femoral host bone quality, this reconstruction method can achieve robust femoral reconstruction. Femorl reconstruction using PFR with a locking plate is a particularly beneficial reconstruction method for older patients with massive proximal femoral bone loss.

Indexed as

Femoral reconstructionLocking plateMassive proximal femoral bone lossProximal femoral replacementStem loosening

Identifiers

PMID40354518
PMCPMC12068785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.