ArticleSICOT-J2025
Radiotherapy after surgery for spinal metastasis is associated with superior neurological improvement as compared to surgery alone.
Article in SICOT-J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTreatment of spinal metastases is multidisciplinary, where radiotherapy (RT) and surgery have a central role. The effect of adjuvant post-operative RT versus surgery alone for metastatic spinal disease has not been previously investigated. Our aim was to analyze whether post-operative RT was associated with better functional outcome or increased incidence of local complications after surgical treatment for spinal metastatic disease.
methodsInformation on neurologic outcome of 200 patients surgically treated for spinal metastases was retrieved from the institutional registry. The events of pre-operative and post-operative neurological function, post-operative wound complications as well as death and implant revision were available.
resultsPost-operative RT was significantly associated to superior neurological recovery, evaluated both as restoration of the ambulatory capacity and absolute change in the Frankel score. At the same time, use of post-operative RT was not associated to an increased risk of wound complications. The risk for revision surgery when RT was administered was similar to surgery alone in a competing risks analysis with death as the competing event. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that surgery with post-operative RT is associated with superior neurologic recovery than surgery alone. The results also do not indicate any significant risk for wound healing problems with administered post-operative RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.