ArticlePloS one2025
Integrating temporal convolutional networks with metaheuristic optimization for accurate software defect prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing importance of deep learning in software development has greatly improved software quality by enabling the efficient identification of defects, a persistent challenge throughout the software development lifecycle. This study seeks to determine the most effective model for detecting defects in software projects. It introduces an intelligent approach that combines Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN) with Antlion Optimization (ALO). TCN is employed for defect detection, while ALO optimizes the network's weights. Two models are proposed to address the research problem: (a) a basic TCN without parameter optimization and (b) a hybrid model integrating TCN with ALO. The findings demonstrate that the hybrid model significantly outperforms the basic TCN in multiple performance metrics, including area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and error rate. Moreover, the hybrid model surpasses state-of-the-art methods, such as Convolutional Neural Networks, Gated Recurrent Units, and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory, with accuracy improvements of 21.8%, 19.6%, and 31.3%, respectively. Additionally, the proposed model achieves a 13.6% higher area under the curve across all datasets compared to the Deep Forest method. These results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid model in accurately detecting defects across diverse software projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.