ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of artificial feeding on the developmental cycle of two triatomine species.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLive animals are the preferred food source for rearing and keeping triatomines in insectaries. However, there is an increasing demand for artificial feeding as an alternative method to using live animals. Despite this demand, scientific studies showing the viability of rearing triatomine colonies in insectaries with artificial feeding are still lacking. In this regard, we tested whether feeding triatomines with an artificial system affects different physiological and biological parameters during the insects' development. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThree experimental groups were established for the species Triatoma infestans and Panstrongylus megistus. The insects were fed weekly and individually, with each group receiving different treatments, as follows: A) artificial feeding system with rabbit blood, B) live animal host, and C) alternating feeding (one week A and the next B). The groups were kept under the same environmental conditions and monitored daily. The parameters evaluated per instar and total cycle were the effect of the blood supply method on the insects' developmental time, the association between feeding method and insect mortality, weight gain, and the number of feedings needed to trigger molting. The latter two were evaluated only in P. megistus. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Sex did not influence the insects' survival or weight gain. The biological cycle duration was shortest in insects fed on a live animal host, followed by the group fed alternately, and longest in those fed artificially. Panstrongylus megistus fed on an artificial system required more feedings to complete molting and gained less weight. The insect mortality rate was not influenced by the feeding method. This is the first study showing that artificial feeding conditions affect different physiological parameters in two triatomine species, questioning the viability of exclusive artificial feeding as a sustainable strategy in a laboratory environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.