ArticlePloS one2025
A comprehensive protocol for PDMS fabrication for use in cell culture.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microengineered bone models: advances and applications of bone-on-a-chip technology.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Construction, evaluation, and applications of renal barrier-on-a-chip system.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Engineering a Quantitative Organ-on-a-Chip Platform for Myogenic Mechanobiology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanical memory in cells: mechanisms, effects, and applications in regenerative medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Effects and mechanisms of iron overload on the proliferation and differentiation of preosteoblastic cellsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cells exhibit remarkable sensitivity to the mechanical properties of their surrounding matrix, particularly stiffness changes, a phenomenon known as cellular mechanotransduction. In vivo, tissues exhibit a wide range of stiffness, from kilopascals (kPa) to megapascals (MPa), which can alter with aging and disease. Traditional cell culture methods employ plastic substrates with stiffness in the gigapascal range, which does not accurately mimic the physiological conditions of most biological tissues. Therefore, employing substrates that can be engineered to span a wide range of stiffnesses, closely resembling the native tissue environment, is crucial for obtaining results that more accurately reflect cellular responses in vivo. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates are widely used in cell culture for their ability to simulate tissue stiffness, but their optimization presents several challenges. Fabrication requires precise control over mixing, weighing, and curing to ensure reproducible mechanical properties. Inconsistent preparation can lead to improperly cured PDMS substrates, compromising experimental outcomes. Additionally, PDMS's inherent hydrophobicity poses challenges for cell attachment, necessitating surface modifications to enhance adhesion. Moreover, the risk of contamination during the sterilization process necessitates stringent protocols to maintain cell culture integrity. These challenges are further compounded by substrate autofluorescence which can cause difficulties when imaging cells. The aim of this study is to develop a standardized method for fabricating PDMS substrates with tuneable stiffness, ranging from kPa to MPa, suitable for diverse cell types using standard laboratory equipment. This method aims to minimize the complexity and equipment required for PDMS fabrication, ensuring reproducibility and ease of use. Achieving consistent and contaminant-free PDMS substrates will facilitate a broader adoption of these substrates in mechanobiology research and improve the relevance of in vitro models to in vivo conditions. Ultimately, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of cellular responses to mechanical cues in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.