ArticlePloS one2025
Psychometric assessment of the Persian translated version of the "medical artificial intlligence readiness scale for medical students".
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric evaluation of an instrument measuring artificial intelligence utilization in decision-making domains of healthcare organizations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Translation and psychometric validation of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale (MAIRS-MS) for Chinese medical students.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has recently entered the medical field, but the level of readiness of medical students for it is not obvious. A tool with appropriate psychometric properties for use in different languages and for international comparison is required to measure this readiness. Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS) is most complete scale for this purpose till now.
objectivesThe purpose was to evaluate the Psychometric properties of the Persian-translated version of the MAIRS-MS and verify the replication of the original factor structure in Persian. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted at Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2023. Validation of the Persian translated scale (P-MAIRS-MS) was performed by determining the face, content, and construct validity and reliability, impact Score, CVI, CVR, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and ICC, and performing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). AMOS26 and SPSS26 software were used.
resultsThe translated scale had good quantitative and qualitative face and content validity (all items had the Impact Score higher than 1.5, CVI >= 0.8 and CVR>= 0.8). CFA confirmed the appropriate fit of the four-factor model (χ2/df = 1.963, RMSEA-0.063, CFI = 0.939, GFI = 0.901). Convergent validity was suitable in the first- and second-order CFA (AVE > 0.5, CR > 0.7 CR > AVE for each factor except Ability). Cronbach's alpha (α=0.938) and McDonald's omega (ω= 0.938), and ICC (0.992) indicated acceptable reliability and reproducibility of the scale.
conclusionThe P-MAIRS-MS demonstrated good psychometric properties and can be used for measuring and international comparing the medical students' readiness for AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.