Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354446›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Inner pace: A dynamic exploration and analysis of basketball game pace.

Fei Zhang, Qing Yi, Rui Dong, Jin Yan, Xiao Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fei ZhangHangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qing YiCollege of Physical Education, Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Rui DongCollege of Physical Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Jin YanSchool of Physical Education and Sports Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiao XuCollege of Physical Education, Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6921-2851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the dynamics of basketball game pace and its influence on game outcomes through a novel intra-game segmentation approach. By employing K-means clustering on possession duration, we categorized possessions from 1,141 NBA games in the 2019-2020 season into high-frequency (HFS), low-frequency (LFS), and normal-frequency segments (NFS). A sliding window method was utilized to identify these segments, revealing distinct temporal patterns within games. To analyze the predictive value of these segments, we applied machine learning models, including Random Forest and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), complemented by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretability. Our findings demonstrate that HFS segments increase toward the end of each quarter, driven by rapid transitions and tactical urgency, whereas LFS segments dominate the middle phases, reflecting strategic tempo control. NFS accounts for the majority of game time but decreases as the game progresses. The LightGBM analysis highlighted the importance ranking of key performance indicators (KPIs) across different segments and revealed differences in the importance of these indicators within each segment. Compared to traditional methods, our approach provides a finer-grained analysis of game pace dynamics and offers actionable insights for optimizing coaching strategies. This study not only advances the understanding of basketball game rhythm but also establishes a robust framework for integrating machine learning and statistical models in sports analysis.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceBasketballHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40354446
PMCPMC12068714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.