ArticlePloS one2025
Inner pace: A dynamic exploration and analysis of basketball game pace.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endogenous oxytocin-linked heart-rate synchrony and social connection during live sports spectatorship.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Situational influences on officiating performance: An analysis of foul calls in the Chinese basketball association league (CBA).PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the dynamics of basketball game pace and its influence on game outcomes through a novel intra-game segmentation approach. By employing K-means clustering on possession duration, we categorized possessions from 1,141 NBA games in the 2019-2020 season into high-frequency (HFS), low-frequency (LFS), and normal-frequency segments (NFS). A sliding window method was utilized to identify these segments, revealing distinct temporal patterns within games. To analyze the predictive value of these segments, we applied machine learning models, including Random Forest and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), complemented by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretability. Our findings demonstrate that HFS segments increase toward the end of each quarter, driven by rapid transitions and tactical urgency, whereas LFS segments dominate the middle phases, reflecting strategic tempo control. NFS accounts for the majority of game time but decreases as the game progresses. The LightGBM analysis highlighted the importance ranking of key performance indicators (KPIs) across different segments and revealed differences in the importance of these indicators within each segment. Compared to traditional methods, our approach provides a finer-grained analysis of game pace dynamics and offers actionable insights for optimizing coaching strategies. This study not only advances the understanding of basketball game rhythm but also establishes a robust framework for integrating machine learning and statistical models in sports analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.