ArticlePloS one2025
Cardiovascular safety of Janus kinase inhibitors: A pharmacovigilance study from 2012-2023.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- JAK inhibitors and adverse cardiovascular events: Class effect or molecule-specific risk?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Thromboembolic adverse events associated with TPO-RA in ITP treatment: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Fatal Suicide Attempt with Upadacitinib (RinvoqReports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Biologic Therapies and Major Cardiovascular Events in Psoriasis: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Beyond Lipids and Platelets: A Review of Anti-Inflammatory Strategies in Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Case of Sweet Syndrome Complicating Ulcerative Colitis Treated With Upadacitinib.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Arrhythmias in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Call for a Multidisciplinary Team.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) are increasingly used for autoimmune diseases, prompting concerns about their cardiovascular safety. This study aims to assess the cardiovascular safety of JAKinibs in real-world settings. We conducted a retrospective analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from the fourth quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2023, focusing on cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) associated with JAKinibs. We used disproportionality analysis to calculate reporting odds ratios (RORs) and identify signals of increased cardiovascular risk. This study identified 13,556 reports of cardiovascular AEs associated with JAKinibs in the FAERS database. Compared to the full database, Baricitinib exhibited significant signals for embolic and thrombotic events (ROR025 = 5.58), ischemic heart disease (ROR025 = 1.56), and cardiac arrhythmias (ROR025 = 1.14). Tofacitinib was associated with the signal for hypertension (ROR025 = 1.05), and upadacitinib was linked to embolic and thrombotic events (ROR025 = 1.23). When compared to TNF-α inhibitors, upadacitinib, baricitinib and tofacitinib showed 7, 6, and 2 positive signals, respectively (all ROR025 > 1). These findings highlight the need for careful cardiovascular monitoring and risk assessment for patients receiving JAKinibs, particularly those with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors or older age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.