ArticlePloS one2025
Towards clinical applicability of fMRI via systematic filtering.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is a common practice to evaluate the reproducibility of fMRI at the group level. However, for clinical applications of fMRI, where the focus is on reproducibility of single individuals, the high test-retest reliability that is sometimes reported for group-based measures can be misleading. On the level of single subjects, reproducibility of fMRI is still far too low for clinical applications, not even meeting the standards to use fMRI for scientific purposes. The goal of this work is to enhance the poor single-subject time course reproducibility of fMRI. For this purpose, we have developed a framework for post-processing fMRI signals using Savitzky-Golay (SG) filters in conjunction with general linear model (GLM) based data cleaning. The parameters of these filters were trained to be the optimal ones based on a dataset of working memory relevant signals. By employing our data-driven filtering framework, we successfully improve the average reproducibility correlation of a single fMRI time course from r = 0.26 (as obtained with a conventional statistical parametric mapping (SPM) data cleaning pipeline) to a fair level of r = 0.41. Additionally, we are able to enhance the average connectivity correlation from r = 0.44 to r = 0.54. Our conclusion is that signal post-processing with a data-driven SG filter framework may substantially improve time course reproducibility compared to conventional denoising pipelines. As a conservative estimate, we conjecture that roughly 10-30% of the population may benefit from optimized fMRI pipelines in a clinical setting depending on the measure of interest while this number was nihil for conventional fMRI pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.