Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354437›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Towards clinical applicability of fMRI via systematic filtering.

Jan Willem Koten, André Schüppen, Guilherme Wood, Martin Holler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan Willem KotenInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3661-9238
André SchüppenIZKF - Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Guilherme WoodInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin HollerDepartment of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a common practice to evaluate the reproducibility of fMRI at the group level. However, for clinical applications of fMRI, where the focus is on reproducibility of single individuals, the high test-retest reliability that is sometimes reported for group-based measures can be misleading. On the level of single subjects, reproducibility of fMRI is still far too low for clinical applications, not even meeting the standards to use fMRI for scientific purposes. The goal of this work is to enhance the poor single-subject time course reproducibility of fMRI. For this purpose, we have developed a framework for post-processing fMRI signals using Savitzky-Golay (SG) filters in conjunction with general linear model (GLM) based data cleaning. The parameters of these filters were trained to be the optimal ones based on a dataset of working memory relevant signals. By employing our data-driven filtering framework, we successfully improve the average reproducibility correlation of a single fMRI time course from r = 0.26 (as obtained with a conventional statistical parametric mapping (SPM) data cleaning pipeline) to a fair level of r = 0.41. Additionally, we are able to enhance the average connectivity correlation from r = 0.44 to r = 0.54. Our conclusion is that signal post-processing with a data-driven SG filter framework may substantially improve time course reproducibility compared to conventional denoising pipelines. As a conservative estimate, we conjecture that roughly 10-30% of the population may benefit from optimized fMRI pipelines in a clinical setting depending on the measure of interest while this number was nihil for conventional fMRI pipelines.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrain MappingFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40354437
PMCPMC12068634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.