ArticlePloS one2025
Genetic insights for enhancing conservation strategies in captive and wild Asian elephants through improved non-invasive DNA-based individual identification.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA purity over yield: optimizing extraction and PCR in degraded Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) fecal samples.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Landscape Features Shape Maternal Genetic Structure of Asian Elephants in Thailand: Insights from mtDNA.Biology · 2026Article
- High-Accuracy Chicken Breed Identification Using Microsatellite Genotype Data and AutoGluon Framework.Biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asian elephant is a key umbrella species that plays a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity and ecological balance. As an iconic symbol of Thailand, it also significantly contributes to the nation's tourism industry. However, human activities pose serious threats to their long-term survival and population health. To tackle these challenges and develop effective conservation strategies, extensive genetic reference data were collected to enhance both captive and wild elephant conservation, improve non-invasive DNA-based individual identification, and assess genetic diversity using 18 microsatellite markers. High genetic diversity was observed across all populations; however, high levels of inbreeding were evident in NEI, EKS, BCEP, and wild elephant populations, except for the MEP population, which recorded low inbreeding levels. Significant variation in the gene pool estimates was observed across different populations, with three maternal haplogroups (α, β1, and a tentative β3) identified. A reduced panel of six microsatellite markers proved highly efficient for individual identification. Additionally, non-invasive DNA samples were tested using 18 microsatellite loci for individual identification. Using only 7 out of the 18 microsatellite loci tested, individuals were successfully identified, demonstrating enough discriminatory power to distinguish between individuals. Among these, four loci (LaT08, LaT13, FH19, and FH67) were both effective and efficient for reliable individual identification in fecal samples. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing conservation efforts, including the design of tailored strategies to protect Asian elephants in Thailand and ensure the long-term viability of their populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.