Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354433›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Genetic insights for enhancing conservation strategies in captive and wild Asian elephants through improved non-invasive DNA-based individual identification.

Dominic Kwesi Quainoo, Piangjai Chalermwong, Pittayarat Muangsuk, Ton Huu Duc Nguyen, Thitipong Panthum, Worapong Singchat, Trifan Budi, Prateep Duengkae, Warong Suksavate, Aingorn Chaiyes and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Dominic Kwesi QuainooAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piangjai ChalermwongAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pittayarat MuangsukAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ton Huu Duc NguyenAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thitipong PanthumAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worapong SingchatAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Trifan BudiAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prateep DuengkaeAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Warong SuksavateSpecial Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Aingorn ChaiyesAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Saowaphang SanannuAnimal Conservation and Research Institute, Zoological Park Organization, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanlaya TipkanthaBureau of Conservation, Research and Education, Zoological Park Organization, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuttapon BangkaewElephant Kingdom Project, Zoological Park Organization of Thailand, Surin, Thailand.
Supaphen SripiboonFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Narongrit MuangmaiAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kyudong HanAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-2408
Patarapol ManeeornDepartment of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mutchamon KaewparuehaschaiDepartment of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gittiyaporn LeamsaardDepartment of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chananya KanchanasakaDepartment of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kornsorn SrikulnathAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-7258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asian elephant is a key umbrella species that plays a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity and ecological balance. As an iconic symbol of Thailand, it also significantly contributes to the nation's tourism industry. However, human activities pose serious threats to their long-term survival and population health. To tackle these challenges and develop effective conservation strategies, extensive genetic reference data were collected to enhance both captive and wild elephant conservation, improve non-invasive DNA-based individual identification, and assess genetic diversity using 18 microsatellite markers. High genetic diversity was observed across all populations; however, high levels of inbreeding were evident in NEI, EKS, BCEP, and wild elephant populations, except for the MEP population, which recorded low inbreeding levels. Significant variation in the gene pool estimates was observed across different populations, with three maternal haplogroups (α, β1, and a tentative β3) identified. A reduced panel of six microsatellite markers proved highly efficient for individual identification. Additionally, non-invasive DNA samples were tested using 18 microsatellite loci for individual identification. Using only 7 out of the 18 microsatellite loci tested, individuals were successfully identified, demonstrating enough discriminatory power to distinguish between individuals. Among these, four loci (LaT08, LaT13, FH19, and FH67) were both effective and efficient for reliable individual identification in fecal samples. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing conservation efforts, including the design of tailored strategies to protect Asian elephants in Thailand and ensure the long-term viability of their populations.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesDNAElephantsAnimalsAnimals, ZooGenetic VariationInbreedingMicrosatellite RepeatsThailandDNA

Identifiers

PMID40354433
PMCPMC12068619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.