Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354403›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Pacing and placing in 161-km ultramarathons: Effects of sex and age.

Shawn E Bearden, Irene van Woerden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shawn E BeardenDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-5960
Irene van WoerdenDepartment of Community and Public Health, College of Health, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultramarathons are growing in popularity, owing especially to the participation of women and masters athletes. Pacing strategy, which can vary by sex and age, is a critical variable in determining finishing place in races up to the marathon distance. Whether this is true in 161-km ultramarathons is unclear. We tested the hypotheses that pacing is a determining factor in finishing place and that pacing differs by sex and age in 161-km ultramarathons. Publicly available data from 161-km races (n = 6) were analyzed for years 2012-2022 (n = 56). Linear regression was used to analyze the proportion of time in each segment (between timing checkpoints) by place, sex, and age. In general, runners used the same percentage of their total race time in each segment independent of finishing place, sex, or age. The exception was that later finishers often ran proportionally faster at the start compared to earlier finishers. Finishing times increased with age but pacing was unaffected by age or sex. We conclude that slower finishers paced the same as faster finishers following a relatively quick start in these ultramarathons, and pacing was not consistently affected by sex or age. These findings should inform training decisions and racing strategy in 161-km ultramarathons.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceMarathon RunningRunningAdultAgedAge FactorsAthletesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40354403
PMCPMC12068597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.