Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Supporting infants and parents in the perinatal period (SIPP): Co-creating an improved journey.

Tami Benzaken, Francesca Siracusa, Michelle D'Souza, Radhika Gulati, Esta Orchard, Alexandra Lemaigre, Clare Andrews, Mitch Blair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tami BenzakenRiver Island Academic Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-2676-1637
Francesca SiracusaImperial College School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7845-0026
Michelle D'SouzaRiver Island Academic Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-8910-3845
Radhika GulatiRiver Island Academic Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4804-7951
Esta OrchardDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexandra LemaigreRiver Island Academic Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Clare AndrewsRiver Island Academic Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Mitch BlairRiver Island Academic Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a 70% increase in infant A&E attendance across England in the last decade, much of it non-urgent, highlighting the need to improve parental confidence and services for infant care. A multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals was established with the aim of understanding and evaluating the support given to new parents in the early postnatal period. We recruited parents and caregivers of infants born in a large district hospital. Participants were recruited in the postnatal ward and neonatal unit. Participants were offered face-to-face or virtual interviews with an interpreter where required. Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted between February and September 2022 (16 virtual, 1 face-to-face). Thematic content analysis was used to manually identify codes and refined to develop a common coding framework which was used to identify final themes and subthemes. Following the initial set of interviews, a focus group with 12 different participants was held to validate the themes. Two main themes were identified: (1) service access, continuity, consistency, and personalisation of care are highly valued, and (2) preparation and support during transition is important and individual. Within theme 1, we identified facilitators (health literacy, consistent messaging, telephone line), barriers (staff shortages, communication between healthcare workers, discrimination), and person-centred care as sub-themes. In theme 2, participants highlighted the importance of their expectations of normal, support from family and friends, and experiences using applications and social media. Effective support and care in the postnatal period are vital for ensuring and promoting the health and wellbeing of mothers and their babies. These findings were presented to local maternity services and service users by the research team, resulting in local service improvements.

Indexed as

ParentsPerinatal CareAdultEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID40354358
PMCPMC12068575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.