ArticlePloS one2025
Supporting infants and parents in the perinatal period (SIPP): Co-creating an improved journey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a 70% increase in infant A&E attendance across England in the last decade, much of it non-urgent, highlighting the need to improve parental confidence and services for infant care. A multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals was established with the aim of understanding and evaluating the support given to new parents in the early postnatal period. We recruited parents and caregivers of infants born in a large district hospital. Participants were recruited in the postnatal ward and neonatal unit. Participants were offered face-to-face or virtual interviews with an interpreter where required. Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted between February and September 2022 (16 virtual, 1 face-to-face). Thematic content analysis was used to manually identify codes and refined to develop a common coding framework which was used to identify final themes and subthemes. Following the initial set of interviews, a focus group with 12 different participants was held to validate the themes. Two main themes were identified: (1) service access, continuity, consistency, and personalisation of care are highly valued, and (2) preparation and support during transition is important and individual. Within theme 1, we identified facilitators (health literacy, consistent messaging, telephone line), barriers (staff shortages, communication between healthcare workers, discrimination), and person-centred care as sub-themes. In theme 2, participants highlighted the importance of their expectations of normal, support from family and friends, and experiences using applications and social media. Effective support and care in the postnatal period are vital for ensuring and promoting the health and wellbeing of mothers and their babies. These findings were presented to local maternity services and service users by the research team, resulting in local service improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.