ArticlePloS one2025
Selection of dual-channel supply chain cooperation mode of older adults care service under the government subsidy strategy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Subsidize consumers or service firm? The design of a government subsidy policy for an older adult care service supply chain.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study develops a dual-channel supply chain coordination model for services aimed at older adults, taking into account differentiated government subsidies. Utilizing Hotelling and Stackelberg game models, we systematically examine optimal strategies across three distinct scenarios: a non-cooperative mode, cooperation between online channels and logistics suppliers, and a tripartite collaboration involving both online and offline channels alongside logistics suppliers. The results demonstrate that the optimal pricing and service levels attained in cooperative scenarios exceed those observed in non-cooperative settings. Furthermore, within the framework of tripartite collaboration, the influence of enhanced service levels on the optimization of both service pricing and quality is particularly significant. It is noteworthy that government subsidies tend to exert a marginally greater incentive effect on offline service channels compared to online ones, thereby increasing the focus on addressing the emotional needs of older adults. Overall, this research represents a pioneering effort to compare these three service cooperation models, leveraging government subsidies as a catalyst. It not only enhances the advantages of differentiated dual-channel services but also promotes the efficient allocation of resources in elder care through the identification of suitable collaborative strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.