ReviewCardiovascular research2025
Living myocardial slices: walking the path towards standardization.
Review in Cardiovascular research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Load-Dependent Effects of Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter Inhibitors on Work in Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Living Myocardial Slices.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Carvedilol Exerts Cardioprotective Effects Against Doxorubicin Toxicity via Autophagy Modulation and Energetics Restoration.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Living Myocardial Slice Technology for Heart Failure Research.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Models of the human heart for biomedical research: Opportunities and challenges.Physiological reports · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of Human Cardiomyocyte Proliferation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Living myocardial slices retain patient-specific features: Insights into etiology and therapeutic history.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Investigating the mechanisms of small extracellular vesicles in cardiovascular disease using the living myocardial slice platform.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease remains a persistent global health burden, underscoring the necessity for effective therapeutic strategies. Despite significant advances, the ability to mechanistically study human disease and predict clinical outcomes remains limited, especially in complex diseases such as heart failure. This limitation is evident through the continuous high attrition rates in drug development pipelines. To address these challenges and contribute to improved preclinical studies, there is a need for platforms that more accurately recapitulate the human heart. This need increased the interest in living myocardial slices (LMS) - thin sections of the heart of approximately 100-400 μm. LMS retain the native multicellular architecture of the heart and enable extended ex vivo culture. However, as their utilization grows, so does variability in preparation methodologies and readouts. This review provides an overview of differences in sample selection, interspecies variations, intra-cardiac differences, and potential confounding factors. Additionally, we examine culture methods, addressing electrical and mechanical stimulation differences, and medium compositions. Our review concludes by highlighting the current limitations of LMS research and offers guidelines for standardization and future applications. The ultimate aim of this review is to serve as a resource for researchers working with LMS and for those entering this field. By presenting the landscape of methodological considerations, we aim to facilitate informed decision-making in study design and execution. We advocate for accurate reporting of methodologies to promote reproducibility and comparability across studies, advancing LMS research and strengthening its role as a valuable addition to the current drug development toolbox and basic cardiovascular research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.