Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40354116›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Decoding Digital Discourse Through Multimodal Text and Image Machine Learning Models to Classify Sentiment and Detect Hate Speech in Race- and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual Community-Related Posts on Social Media: Quantitative Study.

Thu T Nguyen, Xiaohe Yue, Heran Mane, Kyle Seelman, Penchala Sai Priya Mullaputi, Elizabeth Dennard, Amrutha S Alibilli, Junaid S Merchant, Shaniece Criss, Yulin Hswen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thu T Nguyen *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1185-045X
Xiaohe Yue *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-1949
Heran Mane *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-3282
Kyle Seelman *Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2597-7622
Penchala Sai Priya Mullaputi *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6005-2227
Elizabeth Dennard *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2167-2247
Amrutha S Alibilli *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3932-264X
Junaid S MerchantDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-6211
Shaniece Criss *Department of Health Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-5377
Yulin Hswen *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3203-1322
Quynh C NguyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1184-1560

Funding

Risk and strength: determining the impact of area-level sentiment and protective factors on birth outcomesR01MD015716 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, THU · 2021 to 2025
$3.6M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD015716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major challenge in sentiment analysis on social media is the increasing prevalence of image-based content, which integrates text and visuals to convey nuanced messages. Traditional text-based approaches have been widely used to assess public attitudes and beliefs; however, they often fail to fully capture the meaning of multimodal content where cultural, contextual, and visual elements play a significant role.

objectiveThis study aims to provide practical guidance for collecting, processing, and analyzing social media data using multimodal machine learning models. Specifically, it focuses on training and fine-tuning models to classify sentiment and detect hate speech.

methodsSocial media data were collected from Facebook and Instagram using CrowdTangle, a public insights tool by Meta, and from X via its academic research application programming interface. The dataset was filtered to include only race-related terms and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual community-related posts with image attachments, ensuring focus on multimodal content. Human annotators labeled 13,000 posts into 4 categories: negative sentiment, positive sentiment, hate, or antihate. We evaluated unimodal (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers for text and Visual Geometry Group 16 for images) and multimodal (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining [CLIP], Visual Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [VisualBERTs], and an intermediate fusion) models. To enhance model performance, the synthetic minority oversampling technique was applied to address class imbalances, and latent Dirichlet allocation was used to improve semantic representations.

resultsOur findings highlighted key differences in model performance. Among unimodal models, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer outperformed Visual Geometry Group 16, achieving higher accuracy and macro-F

conclusionsThis study contributes to the growing research on multimodal machine learning by demonstrating how advanced models, data augmentation techniques, and diverse datasets can enhance the analysis of social media content. The findings offer valuable insights for researchers, policy makers, and public health professionals seeking to leverage artificial intelligence for social media monitoring and addressing broader societal challenges.

Indexed as

HateMachine LearningSocial MediaFemaleHumansMaleSexual and Gender MinoritiesAIartificial intelligencecultural determinants of healthhate speech detectionmemesmultimodal machine learningpublic healthsentiment analysissocial media analysis

Identifiers

PMID40354116
PMCPMC12107201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.